MORGAN  CAMPBELL

My goal is to create a high-performance training environment where my clients feel educated, empowered and yield results.

 

My training philosophy is rooted in the scientific principles of training and a “do no harm policy”. I use data, self-reflection, critical thinking and evidence-based research to assist with all aspects of programming and training. My philosophy is in line with the scientific method; test, analyze, implement, monitor, re-test and adapt. Furthermore, my training process begins with a thorough assessment including; a biomechanical movement assessment, and a strength and energy system performance assessment. Using this information I will create a personalized program to address the needs of the individual specific to their goals.

 

To further elaborate, I incorporate the principles of S.P.O.R.T. into my program design. My perspective and integration of these principles is as follows:

 

Specificity: Training will be specific to the individual with consideration to the needs of the athlete, the sport and training history. Generally, a 2-4 year building block will be required before developing more advanced applications of strength and power and “sport-specific” biomechanics. Furthermore, I apply the S.A.I.D principle to training which stands for Specific Adaptations to Imposed Demands. With the understanding that the body adapts to the demands placed upon it, specific activities will therefore develop specific adaptations and ultimately specific results. Utilizing this principle allows for precise results as opposed to a “shotgun approach” or generalized approach.

 

 Progression: Logical progression will be followed in terms of gradual introduction to workload without excess fatigue. Progression of motor skills and exercise selection will develop from beginner to advance on a case-by-case basis. Careful attention to technique and the physiological response from training will ensure adequate progression as well as regression if necessary.

 

 Overload: In conjunction with progression, increased intensity/volume will be built up reasonably to induce soft tissue resiliency and strength improvements. These increases will be carefully monitored to avoid high “spikes” in volume to mitigate the risk of soreness, overtraining and injury.

 

 Reversibility: “Use it or lose it”. If you stop participating in a specific exercise or application of a specific amount of force you will lose the ability to successfully complete that exercise or produce that amount of force. However, you can slow the rate of loss substantially by performing “low dose” training. Low dose training is a method I use for in-season training with competitive athletes to keep them in peak shape while avoiding the consequences of high volume training.

 

Tedium: To avoid boredom, I attempt to build trust and inclusion. Specifically, I see value in giving athletes some autonomy in terms of exercise selection. This could be in the form of specific warm-up drills or primary lifts. The idea here is that including the person in the discussion of programming opens up a healthy and realistic dialogue that is goal-oriented and allows for me and the client to look out for their best interest together. Furthermore, I try to make the training environment fun when appropriate. This could be in the form of games or something as simple as allowing clients to play their music during the session.

 

 In conclusion, through applied sports science, clear communication and careful progression my training philosophy has worked for many clientele of all ages and skill levels. My philosophy will never be set in stone as I will always look to improve it with experience, continuing education and a growth mindset.